Vincent Geddes

@wildmolasses can this be merged in?

Hey, this fell of my radar. Will review next week.

As discussed on the call, lets circle back to this once Rococo testnet is operational again.

I've discussed this topic some more with Aidan. To clarify, a variant of Option 3 is really only meaningful for our own bridged assets (SnowETH for example). Where initiated by...

> @vgeddes I like the approach for low-level channel APIs. Cool 👍 > Looking at existing snowbridge contracts / relayer code, the relayers calls into the parachain using `Utility.batch_all`. Is...

@rakanalh Work on our low-level channels API is progressing well, with most of the ethereum -> polkadot flow implemented. I'm expecting to release the feature for beta testing in early...

Hey @hujw77 thanks for the contribution. I'll be able to review this properly next week, unless my colleagues get to it first.

This problem will be resolved by https://github.com/Snowfork/snowbridge/pull/540

I agree. We've also be wanting this. Keen to get this merged in 👍

Thanks @mr-tron. I've created #259 which should supersede this (also adds tests and other improvements). Think this PR can be closed.