Edd Barrett
Edd Barrett
> since you can also get one directly by finalizing an assembler it's probably good to mention that Exactly! That's how I was getting a buffer. Thanks
Oh, one more I just spotted:  Talks about `name`, but it's nowhere to be seen. Presumably left over from an earlier design?
Thanks! I'll aim to raise a PR to fix these things.
I've pushed a few more commits. I'll wait for you response about the label types before attempting to fix that. I also notice that on nightly rust, `cargo doc` gives...
Let me know and I can push changes to fix whatever I've misunderstood.
My apologies. I missed your message. I'll try to get to this soon.
@CensoredUsername were those changes any good?
FWIW, this is the best I could come up with using the current feature set: ``` main: (sub1 "123") (sub2 "456") _compute_x NUM: echo "hello/{{NUM}}" sub1 NUM: #!/bin/sh X=$(just -f...
Maybe loosely related. Caching would complement the "replace this bit with the result of running another recipe" idea -- since often the output won't change. But caching on its own...
Another idea that just occurred to me: allow definitions of *user-defined* functions. (`just` already has the notion of [functions](https://just.systems/man/en/functions.html), just there's no way to create your own yet)