Willem van Verseveld
Willem van Verseveld
Thanks for sharing! Seems indeed quite nice, we will look into this.
Indeed this issue has no priority, so great if you can look into this!
Hi @evetion, do you have time to look into this? If not, @JoostBuitink has interest to look into this issue (with some guidance/help from your side).
This is not a bug, but caused by a difference in routing concept (local inertial vs. kinematic wave). For the kinematic wave we decided to solve river flow up to...
Hi @SouthEndMusic , thanks for looking into this and welcome to the wflow team 😃! I think this could be a nice approach if we want to stick to storing...
Nice work @JoostBuitink ! I will submit a review this Friday. One question I did already have: you did check the water balance of the vertical part (runoff), did you...
Probably good to check what style the Ribasim team is using and if we can also adopt that style, so this is consistent across the Product line.
See commit https://github.com/Deltares/Wflow.jl/commit/8adf2bfcb6f649df08528af1739bdecbfc0f49ed. This can be merged after a new release of `NCDatasets`.
For the reservoirs and lakes we did take a very similar approach as in the wflow Python version. `q` and `q_av` are actually not completely hypothetical at a reservoir or...
> I'm not sure it happens so often with the classic resolution of wflow that the lake/reservoir area has a much smaller resolution than the cell itself? I mean qlat...