vector
vector copied to clipboard
chore(tests): expose test utilities
- Exposes more test utilities
- Moves
get_receivedto test utility folder - Adds missing docs due to linting error
Datadog Report
Branch report: sebtia/expose-test-utilities
Commit report: f9a30ce
Test service: vector
:white_check_mark: 0 Failed, 2335 Passed, 0 Skipped, 31m 22.31s Wall Time
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 15fc1c3c-8b79-4c9a-b971-3fe8a3bbc8a4 Baseline: 3f59886a39321570e459ba65469d933a968876f2 Comparison: 695f847d1711923261acdec0ad029185c7826521 Total CPUs: 7
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics | ingress throughput | +2.52 | [+2.39, +2.66] |
| ➖ | syslog_loki | ingress throughput | +1.33 | [+1.28, +1.38] |
| ➖ | syslog_humio_logs | ingress throughput | +0.80 | [+0.69, +0.90] |
| ➖ | syslog_splunk_hec_logs | ingress throughput | +0.61 | [+0.56, +0.67] |
| ➖ | syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics | ingress throughput | +0.41 | [+0.25, +0.57] |
| ➖ | http_to_s3 | ingress throughput | +0.29 | [+0.01, +0.56] |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks | ingress throughput | +0.29 | [+0.18, +0.40] |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs | ingress throughput | +0.16 | [+0.07, +0.25] |
| ➖ | http_to_http_noack | ingress throughput | +0.13 | [+0.04, +0.22] |
| ➖ | http_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | +0.11 | [+0.05, +0.18] |
| ➖ | http_to_http_json | ingress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.02, +0.14] |
| ➖ | socket_to_socket_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.03, +0.13] |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.15, +0.16] |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.15, +0.14] |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.12, +0.11] |
| ➖ | enterprise_http_to_http | ingress throughput | -0.06 | [-0.11, -0.01] |
| ➖ | syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics | ingress throughput | -0.10 | [-0.23, +0.02] |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_route_s3 | ingress throughput | -0.12 | [-0.61, +0.38] |
| ➖ | http_text_to_http_json | ingress throughput | -0.41 | [-0.54, -0.29] |
| ➖ | otlp_http_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.42 | [-0.58, -0.26] |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks | ingress throughput | -0.65 | [-0.74, -0.56] |
| ➖ | otlp_grpc_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.74 | [-0.83, -0.65] |
| ➖ | fluent_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | -0.88 | [-1.36, -0.40] |
| ➖ | syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.98 | [-1.10, -0.87] |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole | ingress throughput | -1.37 | [-1.47, -1.28] |
| ➖ | http_to_http_acks | ingress throughput | -2.59 | [-3.88, -1.30] |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | -4.30 | [-6.79, -1.81] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".