vector
vector copied to clipboard
chore(deps): Bump metrics from 0.21.1 to 0.22.0
Bumps metrics from 0.21.1 to 0.22.0.
Commits
da3edb3(cargo-release) version 0.22.03b3a991chore: clean up some clippy lintsc04acc4chore(metrics-observer,metrics-exporter-tcp): update to prost 0.124bc6c26update RELEASES.md0e5874denhancement(metrics): add support for scoped (local) recorders (#414)49d96b1Update ordered-float requirement from 3.4 to 4.2 (#421)545878bUpdate quanta requirement from 0.11 to 0.12 (#396)851c930update changeloge9b8230Try other resolved addresses if the first one fails (#429)52f5a50Add a clippy CI check (#416) (#417)- Additional commits viewable in compare view
You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore <dependency name> major versionwill close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor versionwill close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore <dependency name>will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency (unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot unignore <dependency name>will remove all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition>will remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore conditions
Note Automatic rebases have been disabled on this pull request as it has been open for over 30 days.
Your preview site for the VRL Playground will be ready in a few minutes, please allow time for it to build.
Heres your preview link: VRL Playground preview
Your preview site for the Rust Doc will be ready in a few minutes, please allow time for it to build.
Heres your preview link: Rust Doc preview
Your preview site for the vector.dev will be ready in a few minutes, please allow time for it to build.
Heres your preview link: vector.dev preview
@dependabot rebase
@dependabot rebase
A newer version of metrics exists, but since this PR has been edited by someone other than Dependabot I haven't updated it. You'll get a PR for the updated version as normal once this PR is merged.
Datadog Report
Branch report: dependabot/cargo/metrics-0.22.0
Commit report: a5e1edf
Test service: vector
:x: 4 Failed (0 Known Flaky), 9 Passed, 0 Skipped, 24m 0.61s Total Time
:x: Failed Tests (4)
-
sinks::amqp::integration_tests::amqp_happy_path_plaintext-vector- DetailsExpand for error
est failed, but output was not captured -
sinks::amqp::integration_tests::amqp_round_trip_plaintext-vector- DetailsExpand for error
est failed, but output was not captured -
sources::amqp::integration_test::amqp_source_consume_event-vector- DetailsExpand for error
est failed, but output was not captured -
sources::amqp::integration_test::amqp_tls_source_consume_event-vector- DetailsExpand for error
est failed, but output was not captured
Datadog Report
Branch report: dependabot/cargo/metrics-0.22.0
Commit report: 9799aca
Test service: vector
:white_check_mark: 0 Failed, 426 Passed, 0 Skipped, 4m 11.11s Total Time
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 0fe1ee7e-367d-40f5-8075-eb890b9a17e6 Metrics dashboard
Baseline: 0c1d3b1ca1250e73237ba7b9e20218c2e53cdfad Comparison: 4eb84fb4aeabc5d2d8f3a5b4532bde6b93f80b54
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | -0.20 | [-7.10, +6.69] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks | ingress throughput | +2.26 | [+2.04, +2.48] | |
| ➖ | socket_to_socket_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.29 | [+1.24, +1.33] | |
| ➖ | fluent_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | +0.73 | [+0.24, +1.22] | |
| ➖ | syslog_humio_logs | ingress throughput | +0.71 | [+0.60, +0.82] | |
| ➖ | syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.41 | [+0.30, +0.53] | |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs | ingress throughput | +0.26 | [+0.04, +0.48] | |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.10, +0.11] | |
| ➖ | http_to_http_noack | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.12, +0.13] | |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.13, +0.12] | |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.09, +0.06] | |
| ➖ | http_text_to_http_json | ingress throughput | -0.10 | [-0.21, +0.01] | |
| ➖ | http_to_http_json | ingress throughput | -0.11 | [-0.19, -0.04] | |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | -0.20 | [-7.10, +6.69] | |
| ➖ | otlp_grpc_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.22 | [-0.34, -0.11] | |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_route_s3 | ingress throughput | -0.27 | [-0.59, +0.04] | |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks | ingress throughput | -0.40 | [-0.51, -0.30] | |
| ➖ | http_to_http_acks | ingress throughput | -0.45 | [-1.75, +0.86] | |
| ➖ | syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics | ingress throughput | -0.53 | [-0.69, -0.37] | |
| ➖ | http_to_s3 | ingress throughput | -0.76 | [-1.03, -0.49] | |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.82 | [-0.92, -0.71] | |
| ➖ | syslog_splunk_hec_logs | ingress throughput | -0.90 | [-1.00, -0.81] | |
| ➖ | syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics | ingress throughput | -0.97 | [-1.14, -0.80] | |
| ➖ | syslog_loki | ingress throughput | -1.69 | [-1.77, -1.61] | |
| ➖ | syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics | ingress throughput | -1.77 | [-1.90, -1.64] | |
| ➖ | http_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | -2.06 | [-2.26, -1.86] | |
| ➖ | otlp_http_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -4.38 | [-4.59, -4.18] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: d345d34b-5e1d-4889-b0ee-f45c15f94480 Metrics dashboard
Baseline: fd35e1c54c33e297cdfd48ecfeae344947f303fb Comparison: b2aea48a374259fd289f3ee3bc9a23eb0446b025
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | +40.37 | [+32.36, +48.39] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | +40.37 | [+32.36, +48.39] | |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_route_s3 | ingress throughput | +1.92 | [+1.59, +2.25] | |
| ➖ | http_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | +1.58 | [+1.37, +1.80] | |
| ➖ | syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics | ingress throughput | +1.46 | [+1.33, +1.60] | |
| ➖ | syslog_humio_logs | ingress throughput | +0.94 | [+0.79, +1.10] | |
| ➖ | syslog_splunk_hec_logs | ingress throughput | +0.43 | [+0.33, +0.53] | |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks | ingress throughput | +0.41 | [+0.19, +0.62] | |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks | ingress throughput | +0.40 | [+0.28, +0.52] | |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.07, +0.09] | |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.11, +0.11] | |
| ➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.11, +0.10] | |
| ➖ | http_to_http_acks | ingress throughput | -0.02 | [-1.34, +1.30] | |
| ➖ | http_to_http_json | ingress throughput | -0.11 | [-0.19, -0.03] | |
| ➖ | http_to_http_noack | ingress throughput | -0.13 | [-0.25, -0.01] | |
| ➖ | syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics | ingress throughput | -0.18 | [-0.29, -0.07] | |
| ➖ | syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.65 | [-0.74, -0.56] | |
| ➖ | http_to_s3 | ingress throughput | -0.69 | [-0.96, -0.42] | |
| ➖ | http_text_to_http_json | ingress throughput | -0.80 | [-0.97, -0.63] | |
| ➖ | fluent_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | -1.23 | [-1.72, -0.75] | |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole | ingress throughput | -1.56 | [-1.67, -1.45] | |
| ➖ | syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics | ingress throughput | -1.70 | [-1.87, -1.53] | |
| ➖ | otlp_grpc_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -1.74 | [-1.87, -1.62] | |
| ➖ | syslog_loki | ingress throughput | -1.99 | [-2.10, -1.88] | |
| ➖ | socket_to_socket_blackhole | ingress throughput | -2.57 | [-2.63, -2.52] | |
| ➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs | ingress throughput | -4.04 | [-4.30, -3.78] | |
| ➖ | otlp_http_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -4.20 | [-4.35, -4.05] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".