Uwe Krien
Uwe Krien
I do not fully understand where you are heading for. You can create an EnergySystem object and solve it and then you can create another one and solve it, too....
> For me its rather difficult to see whats going on behind the scenes of Oemof, and what would be necessary to gain that chunk of flexbility. What is hard...
@gnn What about this issue?
This is related to #139.
If you use the `initial_storage_state` for the first time step you need the `n+1` time step to store the storage state at the end. I recently discussed that topic with...
> ...but i can take over that task in the near future. @mloenneberga, do we already have "the near future" :smirk:
It is a nice approach but the last commit was pushed one and a half years ago. Is there a chance of finishing this PR? I changed the base, though...
Voted! If you have tables in the docstring you cannot break you have to exclude the docstring from F401. ```python def function_with_table_in_the_docstring(): """ docstring with table """ # noqa: F401...
> Ok, thanks! I will take some time for that on Friday :) Which Friday :smirk:
I would keep the datetimeindex as the default way but allow Series/Array/(lists?).