Consider using Semantic Releases and Conventional Commits

[xavez]

• See Semantic Releases
• See Conventional Commits

[Wolfr]

We can consider it, but these types of things only make sense if there is activity on the repo ;)

[Wolfr]

We seem to be moving towards a release system, where a version is defined in the minor part (major.minor.patch) still needs special care and could be considered breaking.

So in its current state, for example between Bedrock 1.20 and Bedrock 1.24 there are big internal changes. We could have technically called Bedrock 1.24 "Bedrock 1 2.0" but I think that would cause a lot of confusion (with Bedrock 2 also being a concept).

This is not using semantic versioning correctly (not at all), but I see no way to change this now without creating a lot of unnecessary problems.

[Wolfr]

I never read the explanation about Conventional Commits, interesting.