Tract lists for ground-truthing

[emma-nechamkin]

Getting a sense of whether we are getting "the right thing"

I've attached four spreadsheets, each of which have 25 randomly selected census tracts (as we uncover more bugs, I will blow this out and be a bit more targeted). This is for the first (of hopefully many!) rounds of QA that we do.

Check that:

• [ ] The values match up
• [ ] The colors are what you would expect given the numbers (e.g., the percentile for income is 66th so it's blue)
• [ ] If it's a donut hole at or above 50th percentile for low income, it is included
• [ ] If it should be a DAC, it is a DAC

[emma-nechamkin]

Here are some files to QA

(I am going to repost these with the AML changes)

[emma-nechamkin]

@vim-usds could you post a staging link when you have one? ❤️ 🥇

[emma-nechamkin]

QA_column_details__0.xlsx QA_column_details__1.xlsx QA_column_details__2.xlsx QA_column_details__3.xlsx

[vim-usds]

1.0 staging link as of 8/31/22 3:30pm PT:

https://screeningtool-staging.geoplatform.gov/1829-3671e5/en/?flags=stage_hash=1822/5201f9e4578b09779b7d50f19a06cd005157dde4#3/33.47/-97.5

[vim-usds]

Each of the above xlsx files have been placed into shared doc called "Ground Truthing - 1.0 release"

[vim-usds]

@katherinedm-usds and/or @emma-nechamkin

Are we still using the Ground Truthing document?