upstash
[Docs]: OpenAI docs massively out of date! No GPT5 or 5.1
Documentation Type
Library-specific docs
Issue Description
Thoroughly surprised by this response from the Context7 MCP:
There is no official GPT-5.1 release announced by OpenAI yet
GPT-5 has not been released to the public as of my knowledge cutoff
Documentation Location
OpenAI
Suggested Fix
Surely this is the whole point of Context7, and for GPT5.1 to be missing seems very unusual.
https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/latest-model
Additional Context
No response
Hey, thanks for the heads up here. I've checked with the OpenAI docs in our database at https://context7.com/websites/platform_openai?topic=gpt-5.1 , and it seems that there's information about gpt-5.1 in our snippets. Were you looking at something more specific? Also, could you share which library did your LLM choose in your conversation? It might be that your LLM chose stale library from the search results. I'd be happy to assist you further if you could share your tool calls and their results
Thanks,
I'm on a nextjs project, so I'm fairly sure it chose OpenAI/node using the MCP in Cursor.
However, the quote I gave is from the context7 website 'ask the docs' interface, suggesting no reference to GPT5+ in the docs (although your link proves it's up-to-date, thanks!)
Kind regards,
Mike * * *Mike Thrussell
- Director
07580 072841 @.*** ( @.*** )
accesstechnology.co.uk ( http://accesstechnology.co.uk/ )
Access Technology North Ltd
18 Newby Stables, Newby Hall, Ripon, North Yorkshire. HG4 5AE Ltd 10624121 England #domorewithtechnology
Sent via Superhuman iOS ( @.*** )
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 at 16:36, Fahreddin Özcan < @.*** > wrote:
fahreddinozcan left a comment (upstash/context7#1116) ( https://github.com/upstash/context7/issues/1116#issuecomment-3591791649 )
Hey, thanks for the heads up here. I've checked with the OpenAI docs in our database at https://context7.com/websites/platform_openai?topic=gpt-5.1 , and it seems that there's information about gpt-5.1 in our snippets. Were you looking at something more specific? Also, could you share which library did your LLM choose in your conversation? It might be that your LLM chose stale library from the search results. I'd be happy to assist you further if you could share your tool calls and their results
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub ( https://github.com/upstash/context7/issues/1116#issuecomment-3591791649 ) , or unsubscribe ( https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANFXY4MADJ3A66CX6NOOSFL37HDSVAVCNFSM6AAAAACNRJKSK2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTKOJRG44TCNRUHE ). You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Message ID: <upstash/context7/issues/1116/3591791649 @ github. com>
