unicodetools
unicodetools copied to clipboard
14 letters with palatal hook
L2/24-050, Unicode request for letters with palatal hook. See https://github.com/unicode-org/sah/issues/350.
UTC-179-C59 Consensus: Provisionally assign 14 Latin code points U+1DF2D..U+1DF3A for letters with palatal hooks in Latin Extended-G block as described in document L2/24-050. [Ref. Section 14 of document L2/24-068]
Please add the DoNotEmit data too.
Done. If we are going to get much more of these kinds of proposals, we need to find a way to incorporate validation and regeneration of DoNotEmit.txt in the tools; sorting these entries by hand is error-prone, and having data that is not validated is a good way to have bugs (I could easily have missed https://github.com/unicode-org/sah/issues/350#issuecomment-2018043770).
(The comments also want to be generated; I did not check them, and we should not have to check them by hand.)
If we are going to get much more of these kinds of proposals, we need to find a way to incorporate validation and regeneration of DoNotEmit.txt in the tools; sorting these entries by hand is error-prone, and having data that is not validated is a good way to have bugs (I could easily have missed unicode-org/sah#350 (comment)).
I agree on principle, but I don't understand unicodetools enough to contribute to tooling.
Code reviewers are supposed to catch these issues.
(The comments also want to be generated; I did not check them, and we should not have to check them by hand.)
I have a Python script that deletes the character name comments and regenerates them. I can rerun it after these are merged, to double check.