privacy.sexy
privacy.sexy copied to clipboard
undergroundwires
Add search options to include/exclude fields
I just open https://privacy.sexy/ and write "defender" word for looks functions relatend to Windows Defender but:
Search result have not only points related to Windows Defender
Hi @Drovosek01, since 0.13.0, the search also includes the documentation. So I'd say it's a designed feature rather than a bug. But the search can be more clear with what are the actual matches. Check the docs for those stuff and you'll see why it's matching.
Maybe if the search match is within the documentation, the documentation (i) icon on right, should be toggled on by default. We should then also highlight the matched keywords so it's visible why the search is showing those.
What do you think?
Hi @Drovosek01, since 0.13.0, the search also includes the documentation. So I'd say it's a designed feature rather than a bug. But the search can be more clear with what are the actual matches. Check the docs for those stuff and you'll see why it's matching.
Maybe if the search match is within the documentation, the documentation (i) icon on right, should be toggled on by default. We should then also highlight the matched keywords so it's visible why the search is showing those.
What do you think?
Aww... thanks for the advice. I didn't know about it, so I thought it was a bug.
I think it would be convenient if there were settings in the search.
For example, the toggle switch "Search only in headings (item names)" would solve this issue.
It makes sense.
To refine the UI: Where should we have the search options? An icon somewhere? And where should it be placed? And when should be visible (when user starts typing/searching or before) 🤔.
The goal is to keep the UI minimal, and as clean as possible when adding features.
It makes sense.
To refine the UI: Where should we have the search options? An icon somewhere? And where should it be placed? And when should be visible (when user starts typing/searching or before) 🤔.
The goal is to keep the UI minimal, and as clean as possible when adding features.
What having a firfox like feature
For eg to search only DuckDuckGo we use @duckduckgo in firefox
@plantindesk can you elaborate? I did not understand.
Off-topic: I do recommend against DuckDuckGo. They're deliberately blocking privacy.sexy webpage and GitHub page. Too much censoring, pressuring free speech with their political bias manipulating the results. A lot of sketchy stuff for a website that claims to be privacy friendly, becoming a privacy parody itself.
@plantindesk can you elaborate? I did not understand.
Off-topic: I do recommend against DuckDuckGo. They're deliberately blocking privacy.sexy webpage and GitHub page. Too much censoring, pressuring free speech with their political bias manipulating the results. A lot of sketchy stuff for a website that claims to be privacy friendly, becoming a privacy parody itself.
We also use is: to filter open and close issues in github
I mean like this also pls come at #345