Pavel Abramov

Agreed, it's better done properly. But once this 2 issues are solved on Eden side we're good (for now), right? Would be actually nice to count those pull rates throughout...

cc @yash-zededa for some reason I can't add you to reviewers

I believe this is the reason why this workflow broke https://github.com/lf-edge/eden/actions/runs/9829563875 (last week I released eden 0.9.10)

I have no power here, we have to ask @deitch or @eriknordmark for that

Yes @giggsoff , I'll do them separately :)

> Separately, what is the effort of this vs seeing if kata or k3s would be less effort? @deitch from what I saw kata supports KVM, but I didn't see...

Should be irrelevant once #1037 is merged and escript is deprecated

> @uncleDecart you're getting rid of the whole escript directory, right? Yes, we merge my PR, move tests to NeoEden and then remove all the old tests completely. It'll take...

> UPD: oh, you're only gonna get rid of it, once NeoEden tests are merged, right? Right, would be barbaric to just remove what we have before we create new

We will have to bump version in all the GHA files + in go.mod itself if we want to merge this