Unai Martinez-Corral

@rhinton's explanation is correct. - We require users to use `./` or `/` if they are providing a file. - Users can work around it by removing `./` and calling...

LGTM! @rhinton, do you want to propose a PR? /cc @Paebbels @LarsAsplund

- #841 - #1785 - #1428 - #1781 - #1572 - Maybe conflicting: - #1231 - #1500 See also [Milestones: 1.6.0](https://github.com/spf13/cobra/milestone/7), [Milestones: Next](https://github.com/spf13/cobra/milestone/3) and [Milestones: 2.0.0](https://github.com/spf13/cobra/milestone/1). # Done - #1003...

@marckhouzam can you please create milestone 1.6.0, move the open issues/PRs from 1.5.0 and then close https://github.com/spf13/cobra/milestone/6?

@marckhouzam thanks for a very interesting analysis! It seems that the "main" purpose of `ValidArgs` changed since it was introduced in 2015: - https://github.com/spf13/cobra/commit/9b2e6822e5819fdc8d6c80654b40ba4f805c690a (#69): `ValidArgs` and `BashCompletionFunction` were introduced,...

> I like the formality this PR introduces. I think it will make maintenance easier. > And the new tests are great. This is the goal: https://github.com/umarcor/cobra/blob/args-subtests/args_test.go

@marckhouzam can we please merge this? #1646 has been waiting for three months already...

> Any reason for splitting this up into multiple PRs? Having it all together did delay the contribution several years, because it was apparently too much to tackle. Splitting into...

@jpmcb can we please merge this M-sized PR, to move forward with the series?

@jpmcb @marckhouzam @johnSchnake can we *please* address this before the spring is over?