umami icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
umami copied to clipboard

map remove taiwan,merge to china

Open nickcdon opened this issue 3 months ago • 5 comments

nickcdon avatar Sep 17 '25 07:09 nickcdon

@nickcdon is attempting to deploy a commit to the umami-software Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

vercel[bot] avatar Sep 17 '25 07:09 vercel[bot]

The designations taken here are the way that the Chinese government propaganda wants TW to be called. This PR should not be merged.

ddxv avatar Sep 19 '25 07:09 ddxv

The designations taken here are the way that the Chinese government propaganda wants TW to be called. This PR should not be merged.

The changes in this PR are based solely on ISO 3166-1:2020, the internationally recognized standard for country and region codes.

As a global open-source project, adhering to established international technical standards ensures:

  • Data interoperability with other systems
  • Consistency across the international community
  • Technical neutrality by following objective standards rather than subjective preferences

This is about technical compliance, not political alignment. The ISO standard provides an objective basis that transcends individual governmental preferences.

0x6768 avatar Nov 02 '25 10:11 0x6768

It's perfectly fine for an open source project to show it's support for the independent nation of Taiwan by calling it "Taiwan".

Strictly adhering to the UN (of which China has a permanent seat on the security council and would Veto any attempt by Taiwan to join) is not necessary, and ultimately up to the repo owners.

ddxv avatar Nov 02 '25 12:11 ddxv

The designations taken here are the way that the Chinese government propaganda wants TW to be called. This PR should not be merged.

The changes in this PR are based solely on ISO 3166-1:2020, the internationally recognized standard for country and region codes.

As a global open-source project, adhering to established international technical standards ensures:

* **Data interoperability** with other systems

* **Consistency** across the international community

* **Technical neutrality** by following objective standards rather than subjective preferences

This is about technical compliance, not political alignment. The ISO standard provides an objective basis that transcends individual governmental preferences.

The ISO standard is incorrect. Deviation in this case is acceptable, as Taiwan is very obviously not in the PRC, and is very obviously a sovereign nation. This PR should be closed.

komali2 avatar Nov 11 '25 10:11 komali2