Alper Rifat Ulucinar

Results 62 comments of Alper Rifat Ulucinar

Regardless of the markers, because we have no marker defining a set of fields, we had also better to link this to: https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/terrajet/issues/140 One alternative could be just generating the...

Hi @vfarcic, Thanks for the feedback. I will link this issue to Terrajet's https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/terrajet/issues/92 and https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/terrajet/issues/140. Once we have them, we can add markers for validation and the relevant documentation.

Hi @noyoshi, Looks like we had to exclude `azurerm_route_table` due to a naming collision when `provider-jet-azure` was consuming older versions of Terrajet. However, we should now be able to generate...

Hi @vfarcic, Thank you for suggesting this. I will link this issue to Terrajet's https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/terrajet/issues/92 and https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/terrajet/issues/140. The idea is once we have the autogenerated documentation, either: - It will...

Hi @noyoshi, The service principal resource is provided by the `hashicorp/azuread` Terraform provider as you mentioned. The provider `crossplane/provider-jet-azure` wraps the `hashicorp/azurerm` native provider. Thus we need another Crossplane provider,...

Hi @vfarcic, I've opened a separate [issue](https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/terrajet/issues/140) in Terrajet for supporting configuration of markers on generated fields. Thank you for reporting this.

Hi @lippertmarkus, We generally require PRs introducing new MRs (Managed Resource) to also include a tested example manifest under the appropriate API group folder `examples/`. Could you please also provide...

Hi @bobh66, Do we know how common is remote state sharing between the Crossplane `provider-terraform` and the other Terraform clients? For the upjet-based providers, we support an asynchronous reconciliation mode...

Then what about consuming crossplane-runtime v1.6 in terrajet-based providers and adding the `--max-reconcile-rate` command-line option to these providers? We should also consider the same for the https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/provider-jet-template repo.

I'll take: - Key - CertificateAuthority - Bucket - BucketPolicy - IAMGroupUserMembership - IAMGroupPolicyAttachment - NATGateway Update: All of the above 7 resources have successfully been tested as explained in...