Ulf Gebhardt
Tooling happens here: https://github.com/bundestag/gesetze-tools Data happens here: https://github.com/bundestag/gesetze The data is not reproducable since the official websites do not provide a history, do they?
Ok then I missunderstood
> I can help with GitHub Actions workflow setup if we decide we want that. We want that! Please reference https://github.com/bundestag/gesetze-tools/issues/16 Consider to implement the workflow on the https://github.com/bundestag/gesetze-tools/ repo....
Send seems to work with https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/releases/tag/v1.4.1 Side note: The trash folder is no longer part of the menu. Same applies to Junk & Archive:  
ok I get that - your choice to close this issue - i will live with the ctrl+click ;-)
 While the original fails with "... 65536 characters" the version of @mszlgr fails with "no PR" which is untrue. Please publish your code @mszlgr so we can have it...
I do not report the coverage on the PR, but have a github action check & enforce it - its my chosen solution: https://github.com/webcraftmedia/coverage-check-action See it here in action: -...
@klausbadelt I did not write the `coverage-check-action` tool. Its a fork from https://github.com/devmasx/coverage-check-action with a feature `report_name` to allow multiple coverage reports in one workflow. The original tool made all...
In component: ``` const slide = ref(0) defineExpose({ slide }) ``` In test: ``` it('has slide value 0', () => { expect(wrapper.vm.slide).toBe(0) }) ``` Not sure if proper solution, but...
@wodka Hey how can I help here? I'd like to contribute, but find there are several obstacles to do so. For example this tool is split into 3 repos which...