Daniel Schroeder

> So maybe remove the method (until it's officially supported)? Unfortunately that's impossible. Unless they add a column into their table that says _"This is really, really, **really** supported"_ I...

Thanks for the ticket @gshpychka and bringing this to my attention. The `.hasXxx()` methods currently don't work. That's because all actions/resources/principals/conditions are only stored internally and will be applied to...

Oh wait, actually I already have those methods. 😕 Got to check.

sorry, i currently do not possess the time to look into this. failing to set up a working python env to deploy a CDK stack.

Thanks @nirsnappy! That's a good idea. But quite tricky, I believe. First of all, the package only creates single statements, not complete policies. So we can only ensure a single...

I have actually planned to add the concept of a full _policy_ to Floyd and wanted to deal with it on that level. The policy then knows it's type (`InlineUserPolicy`,...

Hi Adam, I cannot reproduce this. We have multiple stacks based on different 2.x CDK versions and no issues. I just tested again with cdk lib 2.8.0 and 2.9.0. >...

Just to make sure... you're really using the package cdk-iam-floyd and not iam-floyd? The latter indeed does not extend the original PolicyStatement class. That's the main difference between them.

@artyom-melnikov your problem is #149

Personally I do not have a problem with this. Though AWS does. You cannot change the Lambda function name for **existing** custom resources. CFN will fail with: > Modifying service...