udippel
udippel
Chapeau! Works splendidly well here. Feels like another system. May I suggest to move to 2.3, since this is a major step w.r.t. user experience, so that all users can...
(Read this as a comment to the topic in general, as in seizing the opportunity:) Despite of the backup database `gerbera.db.backup`, some of us had problems due to a loss...
To 7.: As long as two different settings prevail, stability is not in sight. They could be contradictory, or have a clear logical or temporal prerogative. Neither makes much of...
I do agree. Was only trying to think of and line out alternatives (even if to be excluded only).
"there is the "Config" section of the UI which actually modifies config.xml." Does it?? (Only if interested, you'd find some discussion about dual configuration a year or two ago.)
(I'd also see this one rather under "Discussion" for being of a more general type) "the "Config" UI section also needs attention. Except for trivial changes (like the Server name),...
That's exactly a first glimpse on the situation that you are experiencing. You, and that's totally okay, prefer writing XML. I am sure that you understand others, too, the 'normal'...
> > > Or changes only for current session, as test case, to revert to the config.xml after the next restart? > > > > > > I think that...
Are we totally confident to have a robust collector of user- defined files and directories as core engine to assemble data to be sent to the users? I wouldn't take...
> The config UI does not save to config.xml but to the database table grb_config_value. There are three different sets of details: Minimal, Standard, Expert. Expert should show all available...