iframe test
Checklist
- [x]
yarn typecheck - [x]
yarn lint:fix - [x]
yarn test - [x]
yarn brl - [x]
yarn changeset - [x] ui changelog
⚠️ No Changeset found
Latest commit: 88fce7469206a4ed5593b4dbf841ca1788e07383
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
| Project | Deployment | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| plate | Preview | Comment | Nov 1, 2025 9:01am |
Claude finished @felixfeng33's task —— View job
PR Review: test
I've completed my review of this pull request. Here's my task list:
- [x] Read and analyze the changed files
- [x] Review code quality and adherence to project standards
- [x] Check if changeset is required
- [x] Verify if changelog update is needed
- [x] Provide comprehensive review feedback
Review Summary
This PR makes minimal changes to the development page, replacing a component with an embedded iframe. While the changes are simple, there are several concerns that should be addressed.
Issues Found
🔴 Critical Issues
-
PR Title and Description
- The PR title "test" is not descriptive
- No description provided explaining the purpose of these changes
- This violates project contribution guidelines
-
Security Concern - External Content Embedding
- The PR adds an iframe embedding content from
https://evergarden.ai/iframe/nh7b9bwz6r72ntgr5e95ye5brs7tjacp - No context provided about what this external service is
- Embedding external content without proper security considerations can expose users to:
- Cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
- Data leakage
- Third-party tracking
- Missing security attributes on the iframe (e.g.,
sandbox,allow, CSP headers)
- The PR adds an iframe embedding content from
🟡 Code Quality Issues
-
Inline Styles
<iframe height="500px" width="40%" src="..." ></iframe>- Using inline styles instead of CSS classes or styled components
- Inconsistent with the project's Tailwind CSS approach
-
No Alt Text or Loading State
- The iframe lacks accessibility attributes
- No loading or error states for when the iframe fails to load
-
Development Code in Main Branch
- This appears to be test/experimental code being merged to main
- The
/devroute suggests this is for development purposes only
✅ Changeset and Changelog Status
- Changeset: Not required (no package changes detected)
- Changelog: Not required (no registry changes detected)
- The changeset bot correctly identified that no changeset is needed, which contradicts the checked box in the PR checklist
Recommendations
-
Immediate Actions Required:
- Provide a clear PR title and description
- Explain the purpose of embedding evergarden.ai content
- Add security attributes to the iframe or use a safer embedding method
-
Security Improvements:
<iframe className="h-[500px] w-2/5" src="https://evergarden.ai/iframe/nh7b9bwz6r72ntgr5e95ye5brs7tjacp" sandbox="allow-scripts allow-same-origin" loading="lazy" title="Evergarden AI Embed" /> -
Consider Alternatives:
- If this is for testing, use environment variables to conditionally render
- If this is a permanent feature, properly integrate it with error handling and loading states
- Document why this external service is being used
File Changes Review
-
apps/www/next-env.d.ts
- Auto-generated change by Next.js (harmless)
- Path updated from
./.next/types/routes.d.tsto./.next/dev/types/routes.d.ts
-
apps/www/src/app/dev/page.tsx
- Commented out
<MarkdownStreamDemo /> - Added iframe with external content
- Concerns noted above
- Commented out
Conclusion
This PR appears to be a quick test or experiment that's not ready for production. The lack of context, security considerations, and proper implementation suggests this should either be:
- Moved to a feature branch for experimentation
- Properly implemented with security measures and documentation
- Clarified if this is intended for production use
Please address the critical security concerns and provide proper context before this can be approved.