Ed Reel

We have been slowly updating packages that are unable to build i686 binaries. I imagine as long as there are some packages that can still build from source, we won't...

@DarkevilPT: I was able to create #9038 but it requires an x86_64 Chromebook with glibc 2.29 or above. My suggestion for Ubuntu would be to enable Linux Apps if that...

@DarkevilPT: We don't have pacman working but a lot of package builds are derived from arch sources. Typically the package has a comment at the top to indicate it was...

An easy fix would be to change from `compatibility 'all'` to `compatibility 'aarch64,armv7l,x86_64'` in xterm. In fact, we should probably change this for all packages that have sommelier as a...

It's actually fixing xterm which really is not i686 compatible. :)

Can you please provide the output from `cat /etc/lsb-release`?

I'm still working on this list. It's just a rough draft currently.

See how your `@_ver` stuff has ruined my script? LoL

@donaldysmith: Check out #7594.

Sounds complicated but I agree. We also need to split out amd64 and x86_64 binaries to account for the processor differences unless we can figure out something compatible with both.