class-transformer
class-transformer copied to clipboard
feature: allow casting of primitive values during transformation
Description
By design, class-transformer
doesn't alter the value of properties when transforming an object into a class, but simply copies them over. However, there is an option (enableImplicitConversion
) to change this behavior, when enabled the lib always attempts to cast the handled property value to the target property type. There are scenarios when some of the transformed properties should be casted in a non-standard way. The most common type of this is the casting stringified "true"
and "false"
to boolean. Currently, the library will cast both values to true, because Boolean("<any-non-zero-lenght-string>")
will be always true.
There have been various discussions requesting to mark properties to be casted in a special way.
The most common scenario when this is required is using the @Query
parameter in NestJS.
Proposed solution
There is two main way to approach this: adding decorators for each supported primitive type or enabling the feature at the transformation level via a new global transform option. Both have their pros and cons:
- adding decorators makes it easier to customize the feature to the users need as they can choose to only transform specific properties with this new decorator
- adding it as a global feature flag makes it easier to apply it at scale if someone needs this as the default behavior
Generally, I believe the decorator approach to be better and I propose the following decorators:
-
@CastToBoolean
- transforms boolean,"true"
,"false"
,0
and1
to the appropriate boolean values -
@CastToFloat
- transforms a stringified number or number to the number representation, but notnull
orundefined
-
@CastToInteger
- transforms a stringified number or number to an integer representation of the number, the number is rounded, but notnull
orundefined
-
@CastToString
- transforms any received values to the string representation but notnull
orundefined
-
@CastToUndefined
- transforms"undefined"
toundefined
-
@CastToNull
- transforms"null"
toundefined
A single property can have multiple of these decorators applied.
Every one of these decorators accepts a single option:
@CastToBoolean({ force: boolean })
When set to true
the decorator will always attempt to transform the received value (except when it's null
or undefined
). However, when it is false (the default value) it will only attempt to transform values when it makes sense. For example:
- for booleans it will only transform
"true"
,"false"
,0
,1
and skip the transformation if any other value is received - for numbers it will only transform if the value can be parsed as a float number (aka:
"not-number"
will be skipped)
The transformation must take place before the implicit conversion of the value (if enabled). When enableImplicitConversion
is enabled both transformations will run on the given property.
Please do not comment non-related stuff like +1
or waiting for this
. If you want to express interest you can like the issue.
Did this get worked on? I'd like to help if this is still pending.
Not yet, feel free to pick it up! Do you have any change request for the proposal or do you want to take a crack at it in it's current form?
PS: If you made progress and I seem to be unavailable for more than a few days, feel free to ping me on Twitter. (I have 100+ notifications on Github, so some of them gets lost sometimes)
This is how I got round the issue while managing to keep the boolean typing.
import { Transform } from 'class-transformer';
const ToBoolean = () => {
const toPlain = Transform(
({ value }) => {
return value;
},
{
toPlainOnly: true,
}
);
const toClass = (target: any, key: string) => {
return Transform(
({ obj }) => {
return valueToBoolean(obj[key]);
},
{
toClassOnly: true,
}
)(target, key);
};
return function (target: any, key: string) {
toPlain(target, key);
toClass(target, key);
};
};
const valueToBoolean = (value: any) => {
if (typeof value === 'boolean') {
return value;
}
if (['true', 'on', 'yes', '1'].includes(value.toLowerCase())) {
return true;
}
if (['false', 'off', 'no', '0'].includes(value.toLowerCase())) {
return false;
}
return undefined;
};
export { ToBoolean };
export class SomeClass {
@ToBoolean()
isSomething : boolean;
}
Any update on this?
Yeah, all great and needed to be done while a go.
When will this be released?
+1
Is there a way now
Still waiting on this btw
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1 W E N E E D I T !
您好, 您的邮件已收到,我会尽快回复,谢谢。
also +1
+1
Is there a way now
Still the best option is using Boolean("
+1
+1
it won't help you guys... this repo is not maintained anymore.. you can copy the code above to your project and use it... I don't see any other solution
this works for us.. doesn't cover all cases - but it's good enough for our needs:
@IsOptional()
@Transform(({ value }) => value?.toLowerCase() === 'true')
@IsBoolean()
someField: boolean;
Any news on this case?
您好, 您的邮件已收到,我会尽快回复,谢谢。
I'm currently using David Kerr solution. But any news?
All the solutions ive seen online for transforming this bug havent been working since the request param im expecting is a boolean not a string. So I casted the type to a string with transformer and ran the following, which works perfectly for my use case. Maybe it will help someone else.
@Type(() => String)
@Transform(({ value }) => {
if (value === 'true') {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
})
public isBoolean?: boolean;
All the solutions ive seen online for transforming this bug havent been working since the request param im expecting is a boolean not a string. So I casted the type to a string with transformer and ran the following, which works perfectly for my use case. Maybe it will help someone else.
@Type(() => String) @Transform(({ value }) => { if (value === 'true') { return true; } else { return false; } }) public isBoolean?: boolean;
Thank you!!! You saved my life ♥️
Any news on this case?
Hi @NoNameProvided,
why do you prefer the decorator approach? For our use case (parsing requests in NestJS), the global flag would be much better because boolean values would not require any special decorators and would be correctly transformed by default as other types. With the decorator approach, I think that developers would often forget about this, which would lead to bugs.
Before I found this issue, I created PR https://github.com/typestack/class-transformer/pull/1686 (it introduces a new global flag to enable the boolean conversion).