eta-hackage
eta-hackage copied to clipboard
cryptohash-md5 and cryptohash-sha1 large input test
Both packages fail the xltest both of which create an insanely large (lazy) input to hash. It was observed that the Eta process quickly went from 1.0GB -> 2.0GB memory usage within a matter of 20 seconds and just stalled.
Moreover, the boundary cases for testing md5 against the reference implementation were failing for cryptohash-md5.
Same deal with cryptohash-sha256. Additionally, the boundary cases are failing (similar to cryptohash-md5)