Mark Tyneway
Mark Tyneway
We decided to not ship [liquidity migration](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/design-docs/blob/d732352c2b3e86e0c2110d345ce11a20a49d5966/protocol/superchain-erc20/liquidity-migration.md) as part of the first release. We should remove the specs for the included contracts and put them into an `experimental/liquidity-migration.md` file
Allowing deposits to trigger executing messages was descoped from the interop devnet. There is a desire to include this feature into scope for the production release. Without this feature, it...
There are a bunch of interop specs that are out of date. This ticket represents the work required to update them to be correct.
**Description** The interop predeploy specs needed some cleanup and standardization. More to come.
There is a desire to have faster blocktimes in the OP Stack. From the point of view of the protocol, what is a blocktime exactly? The only thing that the...
As of today, we have stopped using the `ProtocolVersions` contract due to it being too much of an overhead to keep up to date. It could be worth simplifying the...
Follow up to https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/pull/612 The specs should better clarify the usage of access lists to make it really clear that it is not a consensus thing. It is purely validated...
There is some desire to make the transaction's access list available from within the EVM. It could be thought of as transient read only memory. This could easily be accomplished...
With [EIP-7886](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7886), it becomes possible to charge for gas in any token using a smart builder because the coinbase address (sequencer) is charged for inclusion costs upfront. Since the sequencer...
We want to progress the decentralization roadmap at the same time as shipping interop. We also have a bottleneck at multisig operations, it is a lot of overhead for every...