Taylor Southwick
Taylor Southwick
As @ThomasBarnekow pointed out, this is how it was designed and would indeed take a much deeper architectural change to alter. I agree, however, that this API is wrongly named....
I believe we've had some questions around this idea before, and not sure the best way to handle it. I like the idea of having this kind of thing, but...
Blocked by #1185
Agreed! I'm working on removing the static aspect of it so the data is something that you can control yourself. That's part of the goal with the `Features` that will...
As an aside, you can also set things up in an unloadable `AssemblyLoadContext` if you are only doing it once and want *all* the infrastructure to be removed from memory...
@lindexi are you interested in adding a fix for this?
@m-gallesio I'm working on bringing the source generator to the repo so we can play around more easily with this kind of stuff. Probably a few months off, but that...
Ooh that's interesting. The challenge is that from an API perspective, they may be null since we're creating from scratch and it's not available. It would be great to swap...
I think you're viewing it as a potential semantic constraint of what the structure of the document requires/has as optional. Nullability is definitely not a cure all for all those...