twitter
🤡 badge for climate change deniers (just like you highlight government sponsored propaganda)
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Yes. Climate change is a problem. Climate change denial is a problem. Climate change inaction is a problem. Inaction is caused by denial.
Describe the solution you'd like
Renewable energy. Regen agriculture. Reduction in emissions. End the war. The list can go on and on, check my frens at https://planetarycouncil.org
Describe alternatives you've considered
Blowing up the Parliament, just like Guy Fawkes, such a legend: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes_Night
It would get some press, get some attention, also terrorism charges to spend some with Julian Assange (more than 4 years without trial, judicial kidnapping)
Additional context
Fake news. Click baits. Time on site. Engagement metrics. Attention economy. Outrage farming. Not good for mental health.
I'm putting 1 BTC on the line and want to debate a climate change denier with 99-1 advantage. Proof: https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1673724721601314816
PSEUDO ALGORITHM
- can be hacked overnight
- does not require excessive resources
- overtime can be fine tuned to rely more on AI
- To begin with, only accounts with 100+ followers, 100+ tweets, that tweeted in the past month
- Generate a list of 1000 climate related words, comma separated (that's the exact prompt)
- No rocket science (Elon is doing it), simple
forloop andif elsestatement with a counter. - Total number of tweets is low trillions, shouldn't take long, even written in JavaScript on my Apple Watch
- Climate words / Total words. Receive a number. Sort by number. Now we know who tweets about the climate.
- Only use tweets of the user. Do not count replies for now. Loads of trolls.
- Ask the AI. "It this tweet OK with scientific consensus, or is it leaning towards climate change denial"?
- 3 strikes rule 🤡
- Then run the algo for all the followers
- Mars spends some time in HMP Belmarsh with Assange
(you need to do it quickly, otherwise the incentive to voluntarily go to prison is no longer attractive)
PS. Russia is the only country that benefits from climate change. Melting Arctic opens Northwest Passage. If you do not act on climate you are Putin supporter 🤡 (and they never engage in propaganda)
The reason why I suggested 🤡 rather than 💩 is because some people genuine like poo emoji.
We can figure out any other label to climate change deniers, does not have to be emoji,
Trending hashtag appeared in my sphere of consciousness
Literally on top of my personal recommendations:
Two top tweets (trivially debunkable)
https://twitter.com/namemeifucan/status/1674491357782503437
https://twitter.com/theeZR0/status/1674527088789864466
Tried responding and inviting to 1 BTC 99-1 handicap debate
Is there already some mechanism in place?
For example, if a tweet receives multiple flags it is automatically not-replyable, not-retweetable?
Thanks for educating me, I didn't about this meme: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-aint-reading-all-that
TLDR
🤡 for climate change deniers
@xTrayambak
hardly anyone here denies it
My estimate (not scientific method) is that climate change deniers are 0.1% to 1% of the global population but they are getting disproportionally too much airtime.
Again, my estimate (not scientific method) is that sometimes we simplify:
- chances of yes: 50%
- chances of no: 50%
- principle of fairness
- principle of "innocent until proven guilty"
A determined climate change denier can cause loads of harm, confusion, inaction... I'm determined climate change activist and I was frustrated that they were quitting on me. No honest troll would quit a heated debate with a guy like me, it didn't make sense. Putin, Russia, Arctic, Northwest Passage hypothesis came to mind.
Have you heard of Metacrisis?
Source: https://fortune.com/2023/02/15/trust-in-media-low-misinform-mislead-biased-republicans-democrats-poll-gallup/
Lost trust in media - lost trust in government. Who do you trust? Twitter is fast to operate with Elon. And the pseudocode algorithm is relatively easy to implement, get started, improve over time... Cambridge Analytica tech is "genie out of the bottle" and maybe there is a way to repurpose it towards something good?
Of course cannot ban climate change denial - free speech - Streisand Effect - that's why 🤡 emoji to be taken seriously and explaining: "Russia the only country that benefits from melting Arctic, opening Nortwest Passage, fight Putin by fighting climate change"
tldr: blah blah blah I am very scientific bleh bleh blah blah bleh blah bleh Putin bad (he technically is) blah blah blah free speech blah blah bleh I am very smart give me validation and internet points blah blah bleh
Flat Earth is not dangerous.
Climate change denial / confusion / distraction / inaction is.
My guy. I don't believe in God and neither do I believe in the flat earth theory (it doesn't even exist in the religion I've been assigned on paper).
Bruh. lol. yall are delusional. AI is gonna take over the world in like 3 days.
YES BUT
We invite you to join us now on the next phase in our journey to realizing a fully decentralized AGI platform, governed in an effective, stable, fair and transparent manner by the widest group possible. In this way, a beneficial Singularity has a chance to change the world.
3 mnutes video: https://youtu.be/fWV6UuFLLso
Applied here as well: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/initial-100-million-for-expert-taskforce-to-help-uk-build-and-adopt-next-generation-of-safe-ai
Please tell me this is satire.
Genuine satire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLzPuNL0BKU
Alright, how do you tell the difference between genuine satire and non genuine satire? That's a matter for the courts.
marsrobertson really thinks hes the stuff huh. — @jackcooperusesvim
I do not know what I was thinking / really thinking.
You prompted me to think about it.
Quantum mechanics - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics) - observer affecting the observation.
Actually... Maybe this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor - the simplest answer is often correct
fucking hell can we just publically execute all twitter users at this point?
Balanced approach.
Someone tweeted: https://x.com/packyM/status/1799548979656433769
Tweet: https://x.com/misterduncan/status/1820168563350450324
From the news:
But the climate deniers 🤡 will always find an explanation:
- natural cycles
- magma eruption
- solar flares
- distance from the sun
Science says It is "unequivocal" but the word is too fancy and not everyone understands it:
On top of that IPCC are scientics who are paid by the universities, governments, institutions who can benefit from A B C X Y Z.
That's why I like photos like this, they tell a story, and with the traffic they also invite trolls...
Radical 💡💡💡
Climate change denial police bot 🤖👮🚨 Debating at scale.
I enjoy debating and emotions coming out of it, but it can be seen as an unhealthy addiction. Debating at scale that would be something remarkable.
One of the most outspoken arguments.
It is clearly a man-made catastrophe, so what do you do with it now?
Meanwhile i'm physically located in a place that captures water and grows its own food.