isocpp

isocpp copied to clipboard

ONWERSHIP was presumably a typo. I fixed it as OWNERSHIP.

Ayxan13

Upon reading your document, https://github.com/tvaneerd/isocpp/blob/master/observer_ptr.md, I found one missing argument which is the main reason I am looking into `observer_ptr`, namely the technique called *strong typing* (see, e.g., the blogpost...

HFriberg

## Going Towards a More General Looping Mechanism Document number: DXXXXR0 Date: 20XX-MM-DD Audience: EWG Reply-to: Tony Van Eerd. tt at forecode.com ### Summary Current looping mechanisms (`for`loops, `while` and...

robertramey

One alternative to be added to the list: `std::address`.

akrzemi1

This is likely contentious, but in the guidelines table, should how the conversion interacts with emplacement in containers (and optional and variant) be considered for explicit vs named conversion function?...

mwinterb

It should probably be mentioned that the copy/move ctor should never be explicit. And by 'never' does mean 'rarely' (as usual) or does it really mean never? A heavy class,...

tvaneerd

When is it OK for assignment to be implicit but construction explicit? Howard and I both think "not usually, but sometimes", but have no hard rules. eg. zoned_time = local_time...

tvaneerd

The table needs to separate cast from constructor - the answers imply different results. ie not same thing -> explicit constructor, but does NOT imply explicit cast. So two tables?...

tvaneerd