Pamphile Roy
Pamphile Roy
Thanks for the ping. This looks definitely like a good idea as current functions are partially broken.
Hi @ivalaginja. I am afraid not. It's basically waiting for someone to take the time to work on this. Any help is appreciated š
cc @mdhaber @stefanv @jarrodmillman @j-bowhay and add yourself as co-authors of course š
Hi @charliermarsh @ambv š I had pinged you both on Twitter some years back about a standard for mathematical equations. At the time you both said this could interest you...
Yep that's the idea, wish. Relying on Ruff's team to do it though as I am not sure any of us would have the know how to help on the...
Thanks @MichaReiser š Assuming we get this in (which we should if everyone is happy as to not be blocking anything), what do we do next? Would you be willing...
Sounds like we need to get this in to move forward. @mdhaber @lucascolley are you ok with that? Note that the process for SPECs is changing. We can, and should,...
> I am using SALib 1.5.1 and NumPy 2.2.5, and Iām getting the following warning: `FutureWarning: unique with argument that is not not a Series, Index, ExtensionArray, or np.ndarray is...
No problem. We are tracking the issue so we will get to it when we get time eventually.
Yep, I am all for making a call š I had a look and seems like these sections are not really filled for the current SPECs (0, 1, 4). I...