Pamphile Roy

Thank you everyone for your valuable inputs 😃 For anyone reading we are keeping the survey open: https://forms.gle/Du9Y1aZrDx37LY8Y9 Feel free to comment here as well.

I am +0.5. I personally would go with a separate function. We don't really have a lot of extra info in other tests. Instead we could have a general function...

I agree that we don't want to duplicate the API with a location function for all tests. Here it's just that for this specific test we do something very generic...

Hi, thanks for reporting. Do you still have a problem? Did you find a solution?

Thank you for reporting @smeingast. As noted in the doc, `RBFInterpolator` should be used in new code instead. Hence I am not sure if we would want to do anything...

Correct, the kernel is being called with `kernel_func(np.linalg.norm(x[i] - y[i]))`. So maybe we could add a metric option. The issue being that this part is handled in Pythran at the...

Sorry for the delay @ev-br. Sure I can help. I did not reply to the emails but I am +1 on either deprecating (which I always prefer) or marking it...

Following our discussions during our meeting, I will let @melissawm have a look into the legacy markup. On my side, I can send a message to the mailing list about...

Thank you for the feedback @dopplershift. Normally we would produce warning if we deprecate something. Our usual workflow is, deprecate in doc + code with a warning in version n,...

Why would you not filter out the warning? What we are going to do is pretty standard (not just in SciPy, https://docs.python.org/3/library/warnings.html#the-warnings-filter) and we are deprecating things like that all...