John Wieczorek

Excellent. Thank you for that. I have updated the change proposal. Issue #40 could benefit from similar scrutiny?

I like this solution. Can we defer the creation of the controlled vocabulary for now? Or is it better to defer the review of this term (and [environmentalMaterial](https://github.com/tdwg/dwc/issues/40)) and do...

This proposal has been labeled as 'Controversial' and in need of a task group for resolution. It is no longer part of an active public review.

Hi @Archilegt, This request involves the creation of a new term or terms, thus, in accordance with the [Vocabulary Maintenance Standard (VMS)](https://www.tdwg.org/standards/vms/) Section 3 it requires a full review, a...

Might it be better to be more explicit in the definitions, something like 'an Organism was present at the designated place and time', to avoid the misconception that the term...

Or more in keeping with the proposed term definition, 'an Organism was present within the bounded place and time'.

> @deepreef Couldn't we put your explanations of `scientificName`, `acceptedNameUsage` and `originalNameUsage` into the comments of the Darwin Core terms? We need to capture this for the average user. @tucotuco...

Here is another reference to the need for a way to distinguish data coming from field notes. https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/2432#issuecomment-906888024

This is an interesting case where maybe we could set a precedent by adding recommendations of what to avoid in a term comment along with positive examples.

Thank you @fja062 for this submission. I have added labels and fee the demand justification has been met. Now we'll have to figure out if this is the best solution....