Tobias Steckenborn

Dependend on what you need you might want to check [this](https://github.com/usebruno/bruno/discussions/385#discussioncomment-7813010) as a workaround for e.g. the Client Credentials flow. @Rens660 - I've got quite a similar one for Authorization...

> Hi @tsteckenborn, Unfortunately I am stuck with using Authorization Code, but if you would share your workaround for if, I am definitely interested, thanks! Take a look if [that](https://github.com/usebruno/bruno/discussions/385#discussioncomment-7838309)...

The APP_KEY is defined in the .dev.vars, yet that must have happened through `npx superflare@latest new`. Yet without the worker itself being pushed by that, I don't exactly know how...

Solved in current versions. Therefor I'd argue for closing this.

There seems to be a second issue with regards to composition of many. Having: ```cds entity Test.UserInterfaces { key id : String; testProperty1 : Composition of many { test :...

The bottom one seems to be due to: https://github.com/cap-js/cds-typer/blob/3120af3b62104aa5c5b69b0d65b13c4a1eadc1c4/lib/components/resolver.js#L315 Here it's running as `typeInfo.plainName` which is then for these ones: ```json { typeName: undefined, singular: 'usageStatu', plural: 'UserInterfaces' } {...

As discussed, this would still be interesting for us, especially if CAP supports trunk based development with Feature Toggles a bit better.

Hi Daniel, I assume that here different opinions are necessary (as I also don't know the whole of it's behaviour in CAP). In general afaik on the database the ones...

Hi Daniel, Sorry was OOO last week. I'm not sure if that's the best to achieve the desired effect. If I'm not mistaken whether it's the feature flag active variant...

Potentially any updates on this? A first step could be just typing them as the base type, e.g. string for now?