tslearn
tslearn copied to clipboard
[WIP] Test against python 3.10
Fixes: #374 Now that we have tensorflow 2.8.0 with cp310 support, we can finally test against cp310.
We might need #375 to be able to find a version of both numpy and sklearn that work in enough environments.
We might need #375 to be able to find a version of both numpy and sklearn that work in enough environments.
Thank you so much once again for your contribution! There's a PR ready for that :) #379 , it still needs to get merged.
@rtavenar can we re-run CI/CD and merge this PR if successful?
I guess what we need is to merge main
's latest version on this branch and see if all tests pass, right?
Codecov Report
Merging #384 (be403c0) into main (ea1b19b) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #384 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.55% 94.55%
=======================================
Files 59 59
Lines 4537 4537
=======================================
Hits 4290 4290
Misses 247 247
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ea1b19b...be403c0. Read the comment docs.
Hello, The tests failing are related to the "cesium" package which is not compatible with Python 3.10 yet. I have done a pull request (PR 305) on the cesium package to make it compatible with Python 3.10: https://github.com/cesium-ml/cesium/pull/305 This PR has been merged. Once the next version of the cesium package will be released, tslearn should also be compatible with Python 3.10. (I have asked to be informed when the next version of the cesium package will be released.)
Once the next version of the cesium package will be released, tslearn should also be compatible with Python 3.10.
A new release of cesium is out.
Hello @petoknm, Could you do an empty commit to re-run the continuous integration tests please?
I have done a mistake, I just tried to do an empty commit on the main branch branch of petoknm, but it seems that I have done something different. I will try to correct it.
I have reverted to the previous commit.
The support for Python 3.10 has been added in PR #437 in which @petoknm has been added as a co-author. I now close the current PR #384.