Simon Hausmann
Simon Hausmann
We discussed this a while ago also in our chat: https://chat.slint.dev/public/pl/iqdf3z3xr3fppx1mmsjbarcawa I could reproduce the issue, but I wasn't able to diagnose the root cause.
@Rishant12220055 Are you actively tracking this? > Test: Done and passing There are no tests, unfortunately. I think with tests it would be easier to validate this approach. I'm a...
That’s very tempting. I’m also not 100% sure. What if the tracker hasn’t done its initial evaluation but will do so later on?
Sounds like a good idea to me to collect common files in a common folder, as a starting point. cc @0x6e
Renamed to `examples/async-io` as discussed with Olivier and added a quick README.
Could you post a verbose build log or extract at least the link line out of a build of yours? libslint_cpp.so, as created by the linker rust calls, is not...
You're right :(. We take the value provided at run-time (interpreter `Value::Number`), which is a float. We should convert it to the type in the callback signature.
Sorry about that :(. It's true that we do way too much work for large text input fields right now. We're not using parley to the fullest extent here. We...
Thanks Nico! Do you have a rough idea when you'd like to release 0.7?
I'm not sure that we should change the semantics of `changed plot-data`, but we could have `changed plot-data[]` for example. That said, I wonder if the answer is closer to...