trixirt

A much earlier pr https://github.com/BVLC/caffe/pull/6919

Update for a couple more hipblaslt usages that were added in main this week.

I am working on this. Its a bit involved and in a parallel track i trying to get hipblastlt to build on Fedora.

I have submitted the hipBLASLt package for Fedora here [hipBLASLt package review ](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820) A prelim refactoring of the above change is here [refactored for 2.4 ](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch/blob/rawhide/f/next/0001-Optionally-use-hipblaslt.patch) Fedora/My preference is to...

@AngryLoki This is not really fixing a merge conflict, the base code changed out for under the original patch. I am more in favor of having hipblaslt packaged than having...

> > If I refactor this patch for 2.4, can I also help you package up hipblaslt in gentoo or your favorite distro ? > > @trixirt , hi again....

In the [ 5.7 branch ](https://github.com/ROCmSoftwarePlatform/composable_kernel/blob/release/rocm-rel-5.7/include/ck/ck.hpp#L31) There is missing support for gfx941, gfx942, gfx1012 and gfx1030 So the only generally useful set is the gfx11. Folks will be unhappily surprised...

Could you raise an issue in Tensile for this ? Fedora will use the upstream Tensile, not a copy.

Fedora says 'Me too!' MIOpen 5.6 is on our list for packages and this is a dependent package so I am looking for the tarball, can one be tagged and...

I am packaging MIOpen with the Fedora dependencies for Fedora. The ROCm packages in Fedora are tracked here [Fedora Heterogeneous Compute Sig ](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/HC) To be packaged in Fedora MIOpen must...