tristanlatr

I don't have more insights unfortunately. But what you can do is to use burpa internals and directly talk to the APIs and add your urls to the scope like...

> I am using burpa as a module Then use ``` b = Burpa(...) b._api.include('') ``` > Would you be opposed to a patch that allows someone to add to...

Thanks for the detailed report. So this means that my initial [code](https://github.com/tristanlatr/burpa/blob/main/burpa/_burpa.py#L190-L205) is faulty as well. And yes I'm open to review an PR to fix that and provide an...

Hello @BretMcDanel, Are you still interested into working on this issue ? Thanks

Have you tried it on your end ? Because it seems that it's not even compiling.

> I checked it is working for me. It cannot possibly be true, there is a syntax error :/

Simply don’t run it on windows: just use Kali Linux… I don’t think that maintainers will take the burden of making it work on windows.

Argh, github runners are getting `HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests` from the wireshark server :/

For the sake of passing the tests, I think we should use the local copy of the manuf file only. And update it eventually.

Hello @miloth, There is currently no way to include local objects.inv file. But support for this could be relatively easy to add. Maybe adding an new option —intersphinx-file. Looking at...