Tres Finocchiaro

This breaks automatic deployments but going one-by-one through logprof is the wrong way. It took 5 deployments for this nonsense to deploy an update. There must be a way for...

> I think turning on complaint mode the first time and deploying it once should give `logprof` enough information to generate the ruleset. From my experience, the ruleset generated by...

In regards to the security of this system, git-deploy can upload arbitrary code so I'm not sure how this apparmor helps. It doesn't prevent `git-deploy` from doing anything specific, it...

> Also, you don't have to turn off complaint mode to generate the AppArmor rulesets. This is objectively wrong. Without it, the deployment is in an undefined state, so you'd...

> So our course of action is to turn off ArmArmor completely? I think that's fine by me as well. If you're comfortable with fixing it for git-deploy, I'm fine...

Upgraded phpBB and hit more apparmor exceptions. Had to put it into complain mode, but leaving an FYI here as the ruleset wasn't saved back into this repo.

> To package dependencies of files in subdirectories, one can use `--deploy-deps-only` on all of these subdirectories, which will bundle the dependencies into usr/lib as well. Thanks, however unless it...

> I wonder why your plugins would be deployed to that directory _at all_. Could you share your build script, please? Hmm... I'm not sure what you mean by "why"...

> Why do you even have to use `-l` to deploy those plugins? Normally, you would have your build system (in this case CMake, I guess, without having had a...

> For libraries in directories passed to `--deploy-deps-only`, linuxdeploy sets the correct rpath and deploys their dependencies into `usr/lib`. Great this will fix the problem outright. Will confirm and close...