Tres Finocchiaro

> @tresf I could update the Linux image with a newer CMake using the official PPA if you want. That might be easiest and also won't impact build times If...

> @tresf I could update the Linux image with a newer CMake using the official PPA if you want. That might be easiest and also won't impact build times @messmerd...

> Yes, I think so, though I don't think it will be needed for this PR Actually, we can justify it here since [bad79a8](https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/pull/7252/commits/bad79a84a8742777d74f9e786faaaf20ee8fc567#diff-c353d8c883ae0aa25ad3b3c8a8a6610055fbe93a95a8ef6e7133692d44bf0ce4R74).

I've marked this ready for review because I think it's in pretty good shape. (artifacts should start generating once cmake is updated). https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/assets/6345473/de5565a8-776a-4264-8cfd-8fa825054034

Runners are fixed. As it turns out, the CIs don't have FUSE installed. This wasn't obvious at first because on master, we're side-stepping this dependency by extracting linuxdeployqt before using...

Basic `.run` (via `makeself`) support has been added via 177cd21. This is experimental and should not be offered to our downloads page until it has been curated, but this allows...

> @tresf what's with the mac ci fail, it seems to occur quite frequently ```diff - Error: Command failed: hdiutil detach /Volumes/LMMS 1.3.0-alpha.1.648+pr72 - hdiutil: detach failed - No such...

@Rossmaxx FYI, the CI issues are fixed on master. I'll rebase the qt6 branch so that they exist there as well. The conflicts seem very trivial but if I mess...

> I mess something up with the rebase, I'll try to fix it. I did. Looking into it.

> I did. Looking into it. Fixed. @Rossmaxx want me to fast forward this PR, or do you want to tackle it as part of the unresolved discussion?