Dietrich Travkin
Dietrich Travkin
I prepared a pull request for this issue: PR #2207.
This seems to be related to or a duplicate of #1093.
CallHierarchyItem.detail should only contain the called method's container name, not the method name
> Thanks for filing. > > [@travkin79](https://github.com/travkin79) are you interested in working on this? I'm happy to provide pointers to the relevant code. Hi @HighCommander4, I would, but I'm not...
Hi @chouzz, These are great news. Thank you very much. If I remember right, LSP4E and CDT LSP do not support the new symbol tag values, but I thought, I...
Hi @chouzz, > @travkin79 Sorry for the late reply. No problem. I'm also quite busy these days. It could take some days, before I can give you feedback on your...
Hi @chouzz, I left you a comment on your PR draft with some first questions. It would be great if you could also set [Declaration](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/declarations) and [Definition](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/definition) tags (and maybe...
> Note that we are in the RC1 phase of development where it's more difficult to push though changes that might cause regressions. I think this will unfortunately need to...
I'd appreciate it if someone would review my PR, maybe @trancexpress?
It seems, I fell into the [pitfall](https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/10369) of not knowing, I have to explicitly publish my answers to the reviewers' comments.
Hi @trancexpress, Thank you for looking deeper into my changes and for improving the code. I think, your solution of clearing caches as soon as extensions change works better than...