Timothée Ravier

I deferred composefs to F42.

We can probably include testing bootupd in this list: https://gitlab.com/fedora/ostree/sig/-/issues/1

Bootupd is in F41 but there is still a major bug right now: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraSilverblueBootupd#How_To_Test The fix should be in tomorrow's build.

Hum, the fixed ostree is still not here. You can get it from https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3945fdf385 in the mean time. The main challenge for UBlue from my perspective is going to be...

Can you show me how you added bootupd to the current images? As far as I could find it's not here https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aublue-os+bootupd&type=code and I don't include it in the F40...

> I am glad we decided to not support this, though we have people with custom setups. 😄 It will still be possible to manually setup a boot entry for...

OK, then I wonder how your ISOs work without the post process part from https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/blob/main/f/bootupd.yaml 🤔

Ah it's there: https://github.com/ublue-os/bluefin/blob/d02a9454ffb2e5bc2336b275da02230d77f1deda/build_files/bootc.sh#L4

Then you're lucky no-one tried it out yet as we found bugs! 😅

Bugs when adopting and updating systems without bootupd to use bootupd