Timothée Ravier

> considering this comment from the description of [coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker#1818](https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1818) > > > As this could potentially be a breaking change, we might want to do it only starting with Fedora...

I'm OK with delaying to the F43 rebase. I find very unlikely that someone would have used the legacy backend intentionally. I think we should have dropped the documentation for...

If we delay to F43 then we should merge https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/3573 in this one as well and remove the legacy test.

> This LGTM, but now the alternatives test (that we are also adding in this PR) can't do the full test because there is no iptables-legacy to set it back...

Will rebase / update once https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-cca2fcc70c lands in FCOS.

Yes, this is similar to the logic used by systemd for its configuration files. It allows shipping the defaults in `/usr` instead of `/etc` and have the administrator drop their...

Updated to account for both Secure Boot and non-SB runs. This should work on all architectures but running it only on x86_64 and aarch64 makes sense. > This needs some...

Created https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/issues/4112 to track the work in kola

https://github.com/coreos/butane/pull/508 might help here.

``` [2024-06-20T08:07:06.180Z] # Previous BIOS: grub2-tools-1:2.06-89.fc38.x86_64 [2024-06-20T08:07:06.180Z] # Updated BIOS: grub2-tools-1:2.06-102.fc38.x86_64 [2024-06-20T08:07:06.180Z] # error: Failed to update EFI: No such file or directory (os error 2) [2024-06-20T08:07:06.180Z] + fatal 'test...