second.pytorch icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
second.pytorch copied to clipboard

how's the performance on 16 beams lidar data?

Open lucasjinreal opened this issue 5 years ago • 21 comments

Does there any performance demonstration videos or gif to show detection result on 16 beams data?

lucasjinreal avatar Apr 12 '19 09:04 lucasjinreal

Peek 2019-04-12 18-38

muzi2045 avatar Apr 12 '19 10:04 muzi2045

@muzi2045 Seems a little slow..

lucasjinreal avatar Apr 12 '19 10:04 lucasjinreal

record problem, inference_time between 30ms~50ms

muzi2045 avatar Apr 12 '19 11:04 muzi2045

Then why get this blocked effect?

lucasjinreal avatar Apr 13 '19 09:04 lucasjinreal

@muzi2045 how to prepare 16-beam lidar?make it kitti like format?

jeannotes avatar Apr 30 '19 10:04 jeannotes

do you still use the pre_train model for the 16 beam lidar?@muzi2045 @muzi2045

wyjforwjy avatar May 07 '19 00:05 wyjforwjy

No, that's not pertained model released by Author

muzi2045 avatar May 17 '19 03:05 muzi2045

Thanks!!

Liheng [email protected] 于2019年5月17日周五 上午11:16写道:

No, that's not pertained model released by Author

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/traveller59/second.pytorch/issues/155?email_source=notifications&email_token=AKEYD45YTUONGSENWBIUUNTPVYPRNA5CNFSM4HFOXAY2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVTTRLY#issuecomment-493303983, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKEYD46XXPLC2G3UP4BLZX3PVYPRNANCNFSM4HFOXAYQ .

wyjforwjy avatar May 18 '19 05:05 wyjforwjy

You pretrain the model by KITTI?or by nuscenes @muzi2045

wyjforwjy avatar May 23 '19 13:05 wyjforwjy

both dataset are trained, nuscenes performs better.

muzi2045 avatar May 23 '19 15:05 muzi2045

thank you very much!

wyjforwjy avatar May 24 '19 00:05 wyjforwjy

@muzi2045 Hi Muzi,for pretraing your 16 beam model with kitti and nuscene, did you use the original 64/32 beam data , or downsample them to 16 beam?

Thank you in advance!

turboxin avatar Jun 20 '19 07:06 turboxin

trained with 64/32 beam lidar data, inference with 16 beam lidar data, don't need to downsample @turboxin

muzi2045 avatar Jun 25 '19 10:06 muzi2045

@muzi2045 thank you very much!

turboxin avatar Jul 03 '19 13:07 turboxin

@muzi2045 hello!You mentioned that inference_time is between 30ms~50ms, may I ask what GPU are you using? Could you please also provide some quantitative performance data on your results on 16 beam lidar? Thanks a lot!

turboxin avatar Jul 05 '19 07:07 turboxin

if you using 1050Ti , inference time between 40ms ~ 60ms (without tensorrt speed up) with 1080TI , inference time between 15ms~30ms(without tensorrt)

muzi2045 avatar Jul 05 '19 10:07 muzi2045

trained with 64/32 beam lidar data, inference with 16 beam lidar data, don't need to downsample @turboxin

how to run the demo on my own dataset?(32 beams data),could you help me?Thank you in advance!

mmxiami avatar Jul 19 '19 02:07 mmxiami

@muzi2045 Hi, could u share ur pretrained model. I have trained Kiiti dataset and inference on velodyne 16, but the result seems not good. very appreciate

khanln avatar Aug 01 '19 07:08 khanln

@muzi2045 Hi, could you show an example of how you converted the model to tensorrt?

dhellfeld avatar Oct 15 '19 22:10 dhellfeld

there has some problem in pytorch-> onnx -> tensorRT, I can't successfully convert this model in tensorrt to speed up the inference cost time. But you can refer this repo, the author looks like convert success. nutonomy_pointpillars Good Luck to you @dhellfeld

muzi2045 avatar Oct 16 '19 11:10 muzi2045

@muzi2045 Hi, Thanks for your share, I am a newer in this area, could you give some advice on how to use SECOND do the inference and visualization work as the GIF you shown.

ryontang avatar Jan 14 '21 12:01 ryontang