Solicit mbj to write a mutant exercise for the book?

[dguido]

[mbj]

I'd do that ;)

[mbj]

I'd still love to see the mutant section to expand. Maybe you can find people with more time than me out of our (slowly) growing mutant community?

There recently had been some high quality blog posts, and talks on the subject.

[dguido]

I would support that. Just let me know what I can do to help. Happy to let you do a guest post on our blog about it too, though Hal's new employer may want it instead. Up to you @postmodern.

[mbj]

I'm swamped with commercial work. I cannot even run my own blog I planned for years.

Lets ping some other people with nice blog posts we had recently: @maksar, @backus, @troessner

[postmodern]

I say go for it. The ToB blog already has a wealth of programming/langsec content. A post on instrumenting dynamic languages would compliment the other remill/mcsema posts nicely.

[backus]

@dgollahon might be interested here as well.

Regarding the actual issue here, I'm curious what else you are looking for. I haven't read over the mutant section but I can tell by the examples that it least should be updated to reflect the current CLI options. What else would you be looking for after that beyond "run mutant on things and look for missing test coverage"?