reform
reform copied to clipboard
trailblazer
Form objects decoupled from models.
### RE: Dirty Tracking I have a great big Reform Form that creates/updates a product that is composed of a number models. The form gathers dimensions for the different components...
### Complete Description of Issue When using dry-validation for validation and using Composition, I cannot get the form to validate. ### Steps to reproduce ``` class TestForm < Reform::Form include...
I had my Reform form working with one nested model, but I need that model to contain another nested model. A tutorial has_many steps, a step has_many images. Here's my...
### Complete Description of Issue When you save (or sync) a form that has a collection, and that collection specifies a form object `ItemForm`, and `ItemForm` overrides `save` or `sync`...
Hi there! Thanks for writing a great library! I'm using Reform to a manage a collection of nested forms from a parent form. My parent form looks like: ```ruby class...
Hello, I am trying to find a good approach to implement a form that is half static (fixed form fields), and half dynamic (form fields added by the application administrator)....
Hi. this might be interpreted as a usability issue with the library, but I don't want to create an account with gitter, as it requests for too much information from...
### Complete Description of Issue I've already started this topic [here](https://github.com/musaffa/file_validators/issues/22) too because I'm not sure which one gem of those both refers to that problem. Let's consider following example:...
I'm planning to port [shoulda matchers](https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers) to reform. Should it to be integrated into `reform` or you want a separate gem like `reform-matchers`?
There's already [a 2-year old open issue](https://github.com/trailblazer/reform/issues/156) about this, but it seems to have been abandoned, so I thought I'd get the discussion going again here. Apologies if opening a...
