Port ranges for entrypoints in static configuration

[xzycn]

Welcome!

• [X] Yes, I've searched similar issues on GitHub and didn't find any.
• [X] Yes, I've searched similar issues on the Traefik community forum and didn't find any.

What did you expect to see?

Hi, I have a problem similar to #1677, even if you have added template support for file provider(dynamic configuration),but it isn't for static configuration,as you mentioned in docs:

Go Templating only works with dedicated dynamic configuration files. Templating does not work in the Traefik main static configuration file.

So, you dosen't solve the problem in #1677(want to use template in entryPoints key,but entryPoints key must be in static configuration) actually in my opinion, do you have any advices for this problem? Thank you in advance !

[cferrera]

Any updates on this topic? 🤞

[madhavajay]

I'm also having this issue. Basically, I want a custom HTTPS port in my redirect so that I can run multiple different compose stacks on the same machine bound to localhost. This works fine with the docker provider and labels but I am having an issue where sometimes Windows Docker is not starting the containers correctly so that traefik is not discovering the other services, so I figured a file provider will fix that.

[madhavajay]

Also, another way to happily solve this would be if cmd line args could layer over the top of the static file... if thats possible?

[pacholoamit]

Any update on this issue?

[goevexx]

Seems to be of interest at least for 5 years and now it also hit me.

[xucian]

I currently have to accept a range of 50-100 ports to be forwarded to the target containers. So I have to write those manually in the config file for now. Would be nice to have a range configuration available

[Surfict]

Same problem.

[compiaffe]

Same here

[compiaffe]

Hey there, any idea on a timeline for this issue? Thank you :)

[lukeadawson]

Hi guys,

Any updates on this? 😄

[sammcj]

Any movement on this?

[victorryakh]

Seems like a really useful feature, but for very few people https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues/1677

[jspdown]

Hello @xzycn

We are interested in this issue, and we would love some help from the community.

If you or another community member would like to contribute on this, let us know, and we will work with you to make sure you have all the information needed. Let us know here before you start. We prefer to work with our community members to ensure that we are aligned and can move quickly with the review and merge process.

[xucian]

please reconsider this

[emilevauge]

@xucian I'm not sure what should be reconsidered as we asked for some help from the community on this. If anyone can contribute, we would love to help!