Tim Pope

I've been contemplating something like this: * `[q` = `:cbefore` * `]q` = `:cafter` * `[Q` = `:cpfile` * `]Q` = `:cnfile` * `q` = `:cnext` * `=q` = `:cc`...

See `:help switchbuf`.

Please explain `:Twrite!` in a separate section in the docs, like is done for the no range variant.

@mislav has his own attempt at the panes thing. Check out https://gist.github.com/mislav/5189704

My first instinct is that window mappings are a contentious topic and probably better suited to another plugin. But I must admit your resize maps are tempting. I may try...

Undecided as to whether this is worth adding, but how about turning the `'syntax'` option for just the current buffer instead?

I'm not going to raise the Vim minimum version from 7.4.0000 to 8.2.1978, but I'd be open to a hybrid approach.

Note the option maps are designed to be seen so you can verify their effect. That's why they don't use ``. I wouldn't use `` for those even if I...

I think this would be okay if it respected the `'startofline'` option.

Reveal? Does that mean scrolling, expanding folds, or something else?