Tamas K. Papp
Tamas K. Papp
In order to make use of this package for TransformVariables.jl, I would like to ask for distinct types for *positive* and *negative* (real) infinity, ideally accessible with `∞` and `-∞`....
```julia julia> using ForwardDiff, LogExpFunctions julia> x = ForwardDiff.Dual(-Inf, 0.0) Dual{Nothing}(-Inf,0.0) julia> logaddexp(x, x) Dual{Nothing}(-Inf,NaN) ``` I think this is related to JuliaDiff/ForwardDiff.jl#481. It is the `a == b` in...
The README should make it clear that 1. all functions have working forward- and reverse rules, implemented via ChainRulesCore.jl 2. pull requests should implement and test these, too
This issue is about [pkg.julialang.org](https://pkg.julialang.org), hope this is the right place for it. I wonder if testing could transition to using 1.0 instead, as more than a month has passed...
This is not (yet) a feature request, just asking for advice on using this package. Sometimes the *value* of an argument is not directly relevant, as the body uses their...
I wonder if it would it make sense to allow ```julia """ $(SIGNATURES) """ Base.@kwdef struct Foo a b end ``` document the constructors of `Foo`. This would be especially...
It may be useful to add a `SUBTYPES` abbreviation that expands to something like ```julia subtypes: [`SubType1`](@ref), [`SubType2`](@ref), ... ```
```julia julia> using DocStringExtensions julia> """ $(SIGNATURES) This function destructures! """ function f((x, y)) x + y end f julia> @doc f f(#temp#) This function destructures! julia> VERSION v"1.0.1-pre.0" ```...
One could simply revert #30 to fix this, but if one wants CSE then it can be calculated from first principles. I started a [discussion](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/accurate-derivative-for-tanh/107568) which has numerical examples.
Currently, the package does two things: 1. support an interface for retrieving values with derivatives; as the former are calculated anyway 2. allow preallocated buffers for results. In my own...