Tamas K. Papp

I am possibly an outlier here, but in most cases I prefer the compact output. I am fine with the pretty form being the default, but I am wondering if...

We did not expose that API yet, so currently a workaround would be some variant of ```julia using PGFPlotsX Plot(PGFPlotsX.dictify(["mark" => "*", c]), PGFPlotsX.Coordinates(1:3,2:4)) ``` I can see two solutions...

no, use `color = ...` for that. that needs no extra tricks.

You don't need a string, so you don't need to interpolate: ```julia using PGFPlotsX, Colors c = RGB(1.0,0.0,0.0) PGFPlotsX.@pgf PGFPlotsX.Plot( { mark = "*", "mark options" = { color =...

That would be nice. However, thinking about this, most of the standalone options one would want to interpolate are shortcuts, eg `red` is `color = red`, for which we have...

bump, as we are getting a lot of Plots.jl issues again

I am inclined to use a `NamedTuple` ```julia (left = 1, right = 2) ``` for domains `"1:2"`. Would allow dispatch and not need a new type in the namespace....

Please include a minimum working example to replicate the issue.

@KristofferC: are you sure it does? My reading of [the code](https://github.com/KristofferC/PGFPlotsX.jl/blob/cf6d32798cec7ad07230d81eca16304ee0f4cbef/src/tikzdocument.jl#L137) is that when `!use_default_preamble`, the only thing that happens is that the default preamble is not prepended. The `preamble`...

Yes: when `!use_default_preamble`, the only preamble is that in the `preamble` slot. Like in your example above. I agree that the naming of these functions is a bit misleading. `use_default_preamble`...