Gonzalo Tornaría
Gonzalo Tornaría
> Yes, that should be enough. :+1: I pushed that change here. > I tried to build and check on it `aarch64`: it fails only one test `sage/rings/number_theory/galois_group.py`. Nice, at...
> -rw------- 1 root root 205 Dec 26 17:58 sage-env-config This probably means that the file in your void-packages repo is already 600 and we `cp` the file. There's a...
> it seems that's just an ordering issue? Yes, I'll try to adjust so the ordering doesn't affect the test.
@dkwo both issues should be fixed now :crossed_fingers:
Great! Could you submit your patches as PR to upstream? @ahesford: this LGTM now
> What motivates the switch to SSE2 contrary to upstream's specification? I suggested it, since `cglm` uses sse2 intrinsics and makes no attempt at being compatible with sse. Note that...
> `-msse2` is ok, but the proper fix would be to correct this check in CGLM: https://github.com/recp/cglm/blob/1de373a9bd453d1fff6846db3a01ade8270f12bb/include/cglm/simd/intrin.h#L27 > > It should only check for SSE2 there. I can try to...
> > musl builds failing now... > > Looks like another python-zstandard problem. My split package proposal should "fix" that too. But really it's python-zstandard that needs fixing here. You...
> > BTW, do you really need level=20 for zstd? That's supposed to use a lot of memory. Maybe 19 is good enough (or you could use something like 20...
@unspecd here in this PR we are having trouble with `python3-zstandard` which seems to be completely broken atm.