chore: Rename Sequencer –> Certificate Producer

[dvdplm]

Renaming the Sequencer to Certificate Producer in the whole repo.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 11.88119% with 89 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.15%. Comparing base (b8cd730) to head (6a32802).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...s-certificate-producer-subnet-runtime/src/proxy.rs	0.00%	40 Missing :warning:
crates/topos-certificate-producer/src/lib.rs	0.00%	23 Missing :warning:
crates/topos-node/src/process.rs	0.00%	10 Missing :warning:
...ates/topos-certificate-producer/src/app_context.rs	0.00%	7 Missing :warning:
crates/topos-node/src/lib.rs	12.50%	7 Missing :warning:
crates/topos-config/src/certificate_producer.rs	75.00%	1 Missing :warning:
crates/topos-tce-proxy/src/client.rs	50.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           main     #457       +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage      0   72.15%   +72.15%     
=========================================
  Files         0      219      +219     
  Lines         0    12840    +12840     
=========================================
+ Hits          0     9265     +9265     
- Misses        0     3575     +3575     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[atanmarko]

How did this happen?

[atanmarko]

@dvdplm I would prefer cert-producer instead of certificate-producer. It looks a bit unwieldy in the crate name topos-certificate-producer-subnet-runtime

[dvdplm]

I would prefer cert-producer instead of certificate-producer. It looks a bit unwieldy in the crate name topos-certificate-producer-subnet-runtime

I agree that the name is unwieldy. I would not mind settling on cert-producer. @hadjiszs What do you say?