Tony Han

I'm happy with this feature and PR for it :)

As I said in https://github.com/tony612/protobuf-elixir/pull/15#issuecomment-365290883. I want to give some ideas: First of all, I want to give a summary about extensions and options in Protobuf: 1. Only protobuf2 supports...

Since extension is implemented in https://github.com/tony612/protobuf-elixir/pull/83 I think we can move forward to think about this again.

I feel the correct direction for plugins should be writing a separated protoc plugin and generate separated files. For example, these plugins https://github.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validate & https://github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway work like this. And we...

I got this problem too. From the docker issue, there seems no good solutions now :(

Any progress for this issue?

+1 We need it too!

@scohen Got it, I'll try to solve this. I think this should be a useful feature 😁

@scohen There's one problem: How about deprecating `:reporter` to support `:reporters`?

@scohen Yeah, I'm OK with soft deprecation and we can remove `:reporter` in a future version. I refer `:reporters` only accept a list of names, which is more clear.