Missing data == no cases?

[SamPassmore]

First off, Tom, this has been an excellent resource for data throughout the pandemic. Thank-you for organising it, I am sure it has taken up much of your time.

I was curious if anyone watching this repo had any idea why reporting for particular UTLAs if becoming less frequent. Can we infer that this means there are no cases coming in or is something else going on?

E.g. Bristol only contains data for the 16th and 24th of June, and nothing inbetween.

This is in reference to data/covid-19-cases-uk.csv

[bheather]

In case you missed this the Zoe App is now publishing regional R values if you are taking part in the study

https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/covid-symptom-study/id1503529611

Sent from my iPhone

On 26 Jun 2020, at 08:50, SamPassmore [email protected] wrote:

 First off, Tom, this has been an excellent resource for data throughout the pandemic. Thank-you for organising it, I am sure it has taken up much of your time.

I was curious if anyone watching this repo had any idea why reporting for particular UTLAs if becoming less frequent. Can we infer that this means there are no cases coming in or is something else going on?

E.g. Bristol only contains data for the 16th and 24th of June, and nothing inbetween.

This is in reference to data/covid-19-cases-uk.csv

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.